![]() ![]() Note: When you merge your-default-branch into your-current-branch, after click merge button, just select " Merge Fetched" option and only select " Rebase instead of merge(.)" option. ![]() Unselect all branches except your local and remote branches.Select " Push to origin/your-current-branch".This is good because you can see differences of your local and remote branches. Click " Rebase current changes onto your-default-branch".Now, just come on your-default-branch with your mouse and just right click.> Advanced > Check " Allow force push" box because we will need it. Ive been using only git command line tools on Terminal and wanted to use sourcetree this time. I just downloaded and installed sourcetree (version 2.7.6 177) on my macOS (version 10.13.6). Quick note: I assume your main branch is main but some people has master. Sourcetree Questions pull/push takes forever pull/push takes forever Jaekoo Kang Hi. The absence of the current branch's name adds to the confusion.Ī re-wording that improves the sentence structure and includes the name of the affected branch would afford a huge win for clarity.įor example: rebase $currentbranch to head of $somebranch In fact, it is the opposite that will occur. This video is a quick sourcetree tutorial for how to Rebase a branch in a local git repo. The preposition “ onto” in the current text is misleading it implies that the object of the sentence ( $somebranch in my example) will receive the changes. In other words it rebases $somebranch onto (or into) the current branch, not the other way around. It rebases the current branch to the state of $somebranch Check out this improvement discussion SRCTREE-1578.Īfter finding myself baffled attempting to bring a feature branch up to date with development and failing, I've come to realize that the left-pane context menu item labeled “ rebase current changes onto $somebranch” actually does the opposite of what its name suggests: ![]() Your scenario has a commit from a completely different branch. So in SourceTree, you need to right-click on master (while dev is checked out), and select: Rebase current changes onto masterĬurrent Naming of " rebase current changes onto " is misleading. In this scenario, you could rebase your commit on top of the other commits. That means: current branch is dev: to be rebased on top of master. Rebasing replays changes from one line of work onto another in the order they were introduced, whereas merging takes the endpoints and merges them together. Rebasing dev on top of dev means an no-op. I resolved some conflicts, then continued the rebase but its not finishing. Yes, because current changes are the one of the current branches, which is dev. Normally it takes a few seconds but this time its been more than 30 minutes. But picking this option seems have no effect whatsoever. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |